Posts: 75
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
2
im going to be pc gaming a lot after i get all the parts but i have been thinking the i5 and i7 processors seem so equal in both ways and i don't really see the point of getting a more expensive product when the other one seems perfectly fine, or are there major differences i am not aware of.
a response to this would great because i kind of want to stay in a little bit of a budget
Nod at the bird and people die!
Posts: 6,052
Threads: 429
Joined: Oct 2010
yes there are hugh differences
i5 < i7
4cores/4threads < 4cores/8threads
< 100mhz faster
< Hyperthreading
Posts: 6,052
Threads: 429
Joined: Oct 2010
i5 2500k or i7 2600k <- thread title
you run a mobile version, also 4 cores/8threads, different clock speed, lower cache
Posts: 1,323
Threads: 24
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
91
Nobody needs 8 Threads and I overclocked my i5 2500k to 4.6 GHz so your argument about 100MHz faster is invalid.
But if you are rich then buy i7 2600k.
Posts: 6,052
Threads: 429
Joined: Oct 2010
then try to get your i5 2500k to 5ghz. this is much easier with an i7 2600k
the threads are usefull, always depends on what you are doing on your PC
Posts: 972
Threads: 71
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
15
Video rendering? i7
Anything else i5
Posts: 75
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
2
ok i guess ill just go with the more cost effective i5 because it seems i'm going to get more bang for my buck
Nod at the bird and people die!
Posts: 1,911
Threads: 183
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
35
Is there anybody else left beside me who use centrino duos?