retarded warnings

[JariZ]

I already revoked it, and you said you understood why I in the first place gave you that warning.
Now don't bring it up again, I can easily warn you for flaming (if you like to talk about warnings that bad)

[House]

I see whats going on here ... you got bored of modding thing so you started infracting each other ... I see way too much colored users

[JariZ]

Yep, that's pretty much the only thing we do these days to keep ourselves entertained, well that, and creating a huge amount of drama about nothing

[OrangePL]

Look what authority has done to @JariZ . He wants to warn me for flaming because I want to hear @SuperNovaAO 's opinion.

---

Nvm, just realized @SuperNovaAO 's warning was for another post that was indeed pointless.

[SuperNovaAO]

Look what authority has done to @JariZ . He wants to warn me for flaming because I want to hear @SuperNovaAO 's opinion.

---

Nvm, just realized @SuperNovaAO 's warning was for another post that was indeed pointless.

Haha. @JariZ shares my opinion for 1 day and you rage against hin for finally enforcing the rules.

[Arteq]

Well, the spam warning type is meant for unwanted advertisement and pointless post is what I use for posts you shouldn't have made. But it's his choice what he does (spam is still a reasonable warning) and you should not blame anyone but yourself for an attempt to destroy this forum.

The problem is that some people may find one post pointless while some other people may find same post not pointless. This is it, we are all different, so if you can't get the point - this is not a good reason for warning, imho

[Rendflex]

Well, the spam warning type is meant for unwanted advertisement and pointless post is what I use for posts you shouldn't have made. But it's his choice what he does (spam is still a reasonable warning) and you should not blame anyone but yourself for an attempt to destroy this forum.

The problem is that some people may find one post pointless while some other people may find same post not pointless. This is it, we are all different, so if you can't get the point - this is not a good reason for warning, imho

At first, I was like "Wait... did @House just post a serious post?" Then I carefully checked the avatar and was like "Oh!"

[Arteq]

This one is retarded btw. @Expiry date

[House]

Well, the spam warning type is meant for unwanted advertisement and pointless post is what I use for posts you shouldn't have made. But it's his choice what he does (spam is still a reasonable warning) and you should not blame anyone but yourself for an attempt to destroy this forum.

The problem is that some people may find one post pointless while some other people may find same post not pointless. This is it, we are all different, so if you can't get the point - this is not a good reason for warning, imho

At first, I was like "Wait... did @House just post a serious post?" Then I carefully checked the avatar and was like "Oh!"

@Rendflex I always post serious stuff, but if you don't understand the point, you may find them amusing/trolling.

[Arteq]

By the way, just discussing:
The post above (by @Rendflex) can be easily called "derailing" or "spamming" or in any other way, I know you have lots of them. Why? Because the topic is about some retarded warnings and not about me or @House. But if you warn him for this - that would be another one retarded warning, because warning for just changing topic is idiotic, because it is always okay (not only in forums, but in normal speech) to change topics of discussions. imho once again.

---

...I can easily warn you for flaming...

Also, you can't warn for flaming in section that was created for flaming. Your power is not enough. Deal with it.