HIHelp... again

[tsoPANos]

I have a script compile error.could you help me?

line brick_get waittill( "use", player );

Code:

#include common_scripts\utility;
#include _utility;

main()
{
level.door_move_speed = 3 // set this higher for the door to move slower
thread easter_egg();

}

easter_egg()
{
//get the bricks and triggers
brick_start = getent ("brick1","targetname");
brick_dest = getent ("brick2","targetname");

brick_get = getent ("trigger_brick","targetname");
brick_give = getent ("give_brick","targetname");
wait .05;

brick_dest MoveZ( -256 )
brick_get waittill( "use", player );
brick_start MoveZ( -256 )
trig_get sethintstring( "" );

IPrintLnBold( "Search for the hole on the brick wall!" );

brick_give sethintstring( " F " );
brick_give waittill( "use", player );

brick_dest MoveZ( +256 )

brick_get sethintstring( "" );
Earthquake( 0.5, 5, self.origin, 512 );
IPrintLnBold( "You placed the brick!" );

thread DISCOVER();
}

DISCOVER()
{
door = getent ("door","targetname");
door MoveZ( -100, level.door_move_speed )

}

[Rendflex]

MoveZ requires the time parameter.

See this:
http://www.zeroy.com/script/motion/movez.htm


Edit:
You also forgot to set ";" after moveZ.

[trasto]

brick_dest MoveZ( -256 );<---


";" missing in 3 lines

[Rendflex]

brick_dest MoveZ( -256 );<---


";" missing in 3 lines

Yes... I already mentioned that.

[tsoPANos]

and what about the line

brick_get waittill( "use", player );

[Yamato]

and what about the line

brick_get waittill( "use", player );

No error on that, just the movezs

[tsoPANos]

COD 4 says bad syntax at the line

Code:

brick_get waittill( "use", player );

Should I make it like this?

Code:

brick_get waittill( "trigger", player );

[Rendflex]

COD 4 says bad syntax at the line

Code:

brick_get waittill( "use", player );

Should I make it like this?

Code:

brick_get waittill( "trigger", player );

Yes.

[zxz0O0]

@Rendflex I don't think this triggers a bad syntax error.

Here is also a ; missing

level.door_move_speed = 3;

[Rendflex]

@Rendflex I don't think this triggers a bad syntax error.

No, it doesn't. However, I had to make sure the script worked correctly.