[News] T6 Console [PC]

[AZUMIKKEL]

You immature guys are so funny but on the other side so sad.

@zer0w I am sorry for the retardness of the other posters here.

Yes, you're an unique little snowflake who never flames anyone.

[kokole]

HMM I already posted this on uc forum but here you go:

A little snippet to enable dvars like cg_thirdperson:

Code:

void setVarBO(char* cmd, int value)
{
    DWORD callone = 0x006BE590;
    DWORD calltwo = 0x008A16B0;
    DWORD result;
    __asm
    {
        pushad
        mov eax,cmd
        push 0
        push eax
        call callone
        add esp,8
        mov esi,eax
        call calltwo
        mov result,eax
        popad
    }
    if (result)
    {
        if (*(int*)(result + 0x18) != value)
        {
            *(BYTE*)(result + 0xC) = 0x00;
            *(int*)(result + 0x18) = value;
        }
    }
    /*else
    {
        cout << "DVAR not found" << endl << endl;
    }*/
}

Use:

Code:

setVarBO("cg_thirdperson", 1);

And I say again, this is not tested so someone please test it ;D

callone pattern: \x53\x8B\x5C\x24\x08\x85\xDB\x75\x04\x33\xC0\x5B\xC3\x56\x33\xF6 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
calltwo pattern: \xB8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xB9\x00\x00\x00\x00\xF0\x0F\xC1\x08\x8B\x15\x00\x00\x00\x00\x85\xD2\x74\x13\x6A\x00\xE8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xA1\x00\x00\x00\x00\x83\xC4\x04\x85\xC0\x75\xED\x8B\xCE x????x????xxxxxx????xxxxxxx????x????xxxxxxxxx

Use it in your injected hax or whatever

[SuperNovaAO]

Doesn't surprise me that this works just as in CoD1, CoD2, etc... all CoD

[NTAuthority]

(apparently I seem to have an account here; also really useful posting page, with a topic review box lacking a quote button)

Doesn't surprise me that this works just as in CoD1, CoD2, etc... all CoD

apparently it only gets 'properly' removed once sufficient people enable it, seeing IW4 and T5 SP (though the latter actually got the code added in after some patch, oddly) - this is just the good old keycatchers value as usual.

A little snippet to enable dvars like cg_thirdperson:

hm, even the dvar finding function wrapper is (somewhat) inlined in here? these inline functions are a mess, especially when the same check gets redundantly inlined around 6 times in the same function while the source data structure remains unchanged - gcc's inlining as seen in CoD4 seems to be more careful about code size though

how NTA says he did it first

odd, I didn't say so anywhere, that's more zer0w's claim

If I cared enough to prove a point, I would photoshop an image of a modloader and show you that I made one first.

the fonts do look different in T6, I'd give you that - on the note of 'a modloader', seems like the 'parser' got removed like in IW5 (and the 'compiler' replaced with something pretty different) and therefore the only 'proper' solutions would be something like InfinityScript.

Its a shame it doesn't actually do anything, but maybe NTA will find a way (probably)

well, there's the usual issues with hooking - CEG's checking of the lower .text segment and the various VAC detections that might exist if using hooks while connected to a SteamGS server; outside of that I'd assume the usual client/ code for key handling is still intact here.

[surtek]

Thanks for your post @zer0w and @NTAuthority .

[AZUMIKKEL]

therefore the only 'proper' solutions would be something like InfinityScript

..what?

[Pozzuh]

therefore the only 'proper' solutions would be something like InfinityScript

..what?

gsc scripting isn't possible.

[AZUMIKKEL]

therefore the only 'proper' solutions would be something like InfinityScript

..what?

gsc scripting isn't possible.

please tell me this is a lie

[Pozzuh]

It's not.

[AZUMIKKEL]

It's not.

gg itsmods rip